Systems and methods for medical image viewer compatibility determination

ABSTRACT

Certain examples provide systems and methods to determine client compatibility. An example method includes receiving a request at an image viewer from a client browser for display of medical image data. The example method includes providing a temporary view to the client browser in response to the request. The example method includes determining client compatibility with the viewer and an associated server in the background at a client device executing the client browser while the temporary view is displayed at the client browser. The example method includes requesting the image data from the server based on the client compatibility determination. The example method includes rendering the image data and providing to the client browser based on the client compatibility determination, the rendering and presentation of the image data modified to enable or disable capability of at least one of the viewer and the server based on the client compatibility determination.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of priority to U.S.Provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/683,438, filed on Nov. 21,2012, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEDICAL IMAGE VIEWERCOMPATIBILITY DETERMINATION”, which is herein incorporated by referencein its entirety for all purposes.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

[Not Applicable]

MICROFICHE/COPYRIGHT REFERENCE

[Not Applicable]

BACKGROUND

Prior to the rapid onset of digital imaging, patient images were“printed” to film. The film was “hung” and viewed by radiologists, whowould then dictate a report. Reports were transcribed by individualsranging for administrative staff to medical transcriptionists and sentto ordering physician via mail or fax. Critical results were deliveredby phone or pager and business statistics were managed via paper reportsand spreadsheets.

As information systems for radiology came to market, the firstcommercially available solutions addressed the needs of the radiologistand the radiology department. These included Radiology InformationSystems (RIS) and dictation transcription systems. RIS systems managedthe ordering, scheduling, patient and management reporting processeswhile radiologists were still reading from film.

As modalities started to support the digital display of images onworkstations connected to the acquisition device, Picture Archiving andCommunications Systems (PACS) came to market. These centrally storeimages and provide radiologists with the tools to read studies onnetworked computer monitors, replacing both film and modalityworkstations.

Over time, the needs of the market have evolved from supportingspecialized radiologist workflows to supporting the open and dynamicneeds of the enterprise and the community. The vendor community hasadded systems to manage the need for advanced technologies for betterdiagnosis; the sharing of images between providers and organizations; tosupport collaboration between radiologists, physicians and teamsproviding care for the patient; to close the loop on reporting ofcritical results and manage the growing storage requirements. Oftenthese are disparate, best-of breed systems that may or may notinteroperate, increasing cost and decreasing productivity.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Certain examples provide systems and methods for client compatibilitydetection.

Certain examples provide a system including a medical image viewerfacilitating rendering and display of medical image data to a clientbrowser from a server. The example viewer is configured to receive arequest from the client browser for display of medical image data. Theexample viewer is configured to provide a temporary view to the clientbrowser in response to the request. The example viewer is configured todetermine client compatibility with the viewer and server in thebackground while the temporary view is displayed at the client browser.The example viewer is configured to request the medical image data fromthe server based on the client compatibility determination. The exampleviewer is configured to render the medical image data and providing tothe client browser based on the client compatibility determination, therendering and presentation of the medical image data modified to enableor disable capability of at least one of the viewer and the server basedon the client compatibility determination.

Certain examples provide a tangible computer-readable storage mediumincluding computer program code to be executed by a processor, thecomputer program code, when executed, to implement a method. The examplemethod includes receiving a request at an image viewer from a clientbrowser for display of medical image data. The example method includesproviding a temporary view to the client browser in response to therequest. The example method includes determining client compatibilitywith the viewer and an associated server in the background at a clientdevice executing the client browser while the temporary view isdisplayed at the client browser. The example method includes requestingthe medical image data from the server based on the client compatibilitydetermination. The example method includes rendering the medical imagedata and providing to the client browser based on the clientcompatibility determination, the rendering and presentation of themedical image data modified to enable or disable capability of at leastone of the viewer and the server based on the client compatibilitydetermination.

Certain examples facilitate a method including receiving a request at animage viewer from a client browser for display of medical image data.The example method includes providing a temporary view to the clientbrowser in response to the request. The example method includesdetermining client compatibility with the viewer and an associatedserver in the background at a client device executing the client browserwhile the temporary view is displayed at the client browser. The examplemethod includes requesting the medical image data from the server basedon the client compatibility determination. The example method includesrendering the medical image data and providing to the client browserbased on the client compatibility determination, the rendering andpresentation of the medical image data modified to enable or disablecapability of at least one of the viewer and the server based on theclient compatibility determination.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a flow diagram of an example method to facilitatecompatibility detection.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example system and associated data flow todetermine client compatibility with server capability.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example processor system that may beused to implement systems and methods described herein.

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description ofcertain examples of the present invention, will be better understoodwhen read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose ofillustrating the invention, certain examples are shown in the drawings.It should be understood, however, that the present invention is notlimited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the attacheddrawings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

I. Overview

In certain examples, a unified viewer workspace for radiologists andclinicians brings together capabilities with innovative differentiatorsthat drive optimal performance through connected, intelligent workflows.The unified viewer workspace enables radiologist performance andefficiency, improved communication between the radiologist and otherclinicians, and image sharing between and across organizations, reducingcost and improving care.

The unified imaging viewer displays medical images, including mammogramsand other x-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR),ultrasound, and/or other images, and non-image data from various sourcesin a common workspace. Additionally, the viewer can be used to create,update annotations, process and create imaging models, communicate,within a system and/or across computer networks at distributedlocations.

In certain examples, the unified viewer implements smart hangingprotocols, intelligent fetching of patient data from within and outsidea picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and/or other vendorneutral archive (VNA). In certain examples, the unified viewer supportsimage exchange functions and implements high performing streaming, aswell as an ability to read across disparate PACS without importing data.The unified viewer serves as a “multi-ology” viewer, for example.

In certain examples, a native reading worklist is provided via theunified viewer. The worklist is intuitive and user defined and caninclude multi-identifier, multi-document, and multi-institution, forexample.

Certain examples provide workflow integration via the unified viewer.Workflow integration includes integration with reporting systems,worklists, voice recognition (VR), electronic medical records (EMR);exporting of measurements; exporting of exam notes; thin slicemanagement; etc.

Many websites provide compatibility detection code in one of the twolocations—client-side or server-side. For client-side compatibilitydetection, a tool (such as ‘modemizer.js’) detects client compatibility,enables one or more flags, and executes code based on the enabled flags.A problem with this approach is that there is a lot of “dead code” inthe client device that will not be executed because it is not relevantfor the currently executing client application. On the server-side,compatibility is determined by the server making a “best guess”regarding a type of client that is connected to the server, based on oneor more hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) variables that are passedfrom client to server. Variables include browser version, basic clienthardware information, etc. However, this server-side approach tocompatibility detection is far from accurate in many cases because theserver has to maintain a map of the features that are supported in theclient and only return code relevant for those features.

Incorrect compatibility detection can result in loss of functionalityand/or unexpected results. Compatibility detection not only determinesif something is not compatible, but also provides a fallback technologyso that under no circumstances does the product not function, forexample. For example, detection of a presence of/support for WebGLfunctionality can be a part of compatibility detection. WebGL functionsmay not be available to a JavaScript Engine. By detecting if WebGL isavailable in the browser, the browser can exercise the WebGLfunctionality, or if not available, then the viewer can implement thesame functionality using a different but similar feature such as Canvasrendering, etc.

As another example, compatibility detection determines whether a systemsupports WebSockets for data communication. If so, then WebSockets areused to transfer, for example, requested image data to from storage to aviewer. If WebSockets are not available or supported, then a WebService, for example, can be used to transfer the image data.

Certain examples provide a zero footprint approach to “intelligent”compatibility detection. FIG. 1 illustrates a flow diagram of an examplemethod 100 to facilitate compatibility detection for a ZFP viewer. Atblock 110, a client requests a page or screen of content. For example, aweb client (e.g., a web browser) requests a page of content based onuser input, and the request is communicated via a zero footprint (ZFP)viewer. At block 120, the client is provided with a splash page (e.g., agraphic, preview image, product logo, status text (e.g., “Loading viewer. . . ”), hourglass, etc.), which is an introductory page to provide theclient with a status notification or initial information whilebackground detection code (e.g., ‘modemizer.js’, etc.) is executed(e.g., by a compatibility detector associated with a ZFP viewer) toaccurately detect client compatibility.

At block 130, the compatibility detection is performed in the backgroundwhile the splash screen is displayed. For example, the compatibilitydetection analyses the elements that are part of a current JavaScriptdocument object model (DOM) to determine features available to theclient. For example, compatibility detection tries to create varioustypes that are specific to support of features in the browser. Anexample is creating a WebSocket instance by checking if the “WebSocket”type exists in the DOM, trying to invoke typed array features for typedarray support in the browser, etc.

At block 140, the client is forwarded from the splash page to the pageor content screen that was originally requested by the client. Incertain examples, since the requested page is a server-side renderedpage, the values that were originally detected on the client are passedto the server. A result of the compatibility detection (e.g., a versionof the client web browser, client browser support for certain webpagefunctionality, etc.) factors into the information passed to the serverand the rendered of the page by the server, for example.

At block 150, based on the input values passed to the server from theclient, the server accurately renders the client page to be displayed atthe client. At block 160, the server-side rendered page of content isprovided to the client for display (e.g., via a ZFP viewer and webclient).

Thus, certain examples provide a more efficiently rendered webpage ofcontent (e.g., reduced or eliminated “dead code”) and a more accuratecompatibility, since the compatibility information comes from theclient.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example system and associated data flow 200 todetermine client compatibility with server capability. The examplesystem includes a client browser 201, a viewer 202, and a server 203.

At 210, the client browser 201 sends a request for content to the viewer202 (e.g., a zero footprint (ZFP) viewer). For example, the clientbrowser 201 requests an HTML5-based image study review to be generatedvia the viewer 202 for display and manipulation on the client browser201 on a client device.

At 220, a “splash” screen (e.g., a temporary, placeholder, orintroductory view) is provided to the client 201 from the viewer 202.For example, a lower-resolution introductory image, an “about” screen, awelcome page, etc., is shown to a user at the client device 201 whilecompatibility determination proceeds in the background.

At 230, the viewer 202 determines a compatibility between functionalityof the viewer 202 and the client browser 201. For example, the viewer202 queries configuration information from the client browser 201 and/orassociated client device (e.g., WebGL support, WebSocket support,operating system version, browser version, etc.).

At 240, a result is provided to the viewer 202. Based on thecompatibility detection result, some or all functionality of the viewer202 and/or server 203 can be provided in content to the client 201. Forexample, if supported, WebSockets can be used to transfer image datafrom data storage to the client 201 (e.g., via a server and/or otherstreaming engine). If graphics capabilities, such as WebGL, aresupported, then those capabilities are utilized in rendering anddisplaying images at the client 201, for example. If not supported, oneor more fallback (e.g., lesser) capabilities are provided to displaysome or all of the requested information, for example. Thus, at 250, theviewer 201 sends a request for content to the server 203 based on theoutcome of the compatibility detection. At 260, requested content (e.g.,image data, etc.) is rendered at the server 203. At 270, the renderedcontent is provided to the client 201 for display.

In certain examples, compatibility detection can be used to help providea zero footprint platform and viewer that facilitates display,manipulation, reformatting, etc., of medical images (e.g., DICOM medicalimages) without a requirement for client installation, download ofviewer component(s) at the client, etc., and which can run on virtuallyany hardware that is able to support an appropriate browser (e.g., anHTML5 browser). Certain examples provide a viewer component tofacilitate image rendering and manipulation; a middle-tier server tosupport transcoding of data (e.g., DICOM data) for image pixels,metadata, and non-image objects. Using this novel architecture,efficient web based browsing of DICOM image studies can be accomplishedwithout the addition of any extra components at the client system, forexample.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example processor system 310 that may beused to implement systems and methods described herein. As shown in FIG.3, the processor system 310 includes a processor 312 that is coupled toan interconnection bus 314. The processor 312 may be any suitableprocessor, processing unit, or microprocessor, for example. Although notshown in FIG. 3, the system 310 may be a multi-processor system and,thus, may include one or more additional processors that are identicalor similar to the processor 312 and that are communicatively coupled tothe interconnection bus 314.

The processor 312 of FIG. 3 is coupled to a chipset 318, which includesa memory controller 320 and an input/output (“I/O”) controller 322. Asis well known, a chipset typically provides I/O and memory managementfunctions as well as a plurality of general purpose and/or specialpurpose registers, timers, etc. that are accessible or used by one ormore processors coupled to the chipset 318. The memory controller 320performs functions that enable the processor 312 (or processors if thereare multiple processors) to access a system memory 324 and a massstorage memory 325.

The system memory 324 may include any desired type of volatile and/ornonvolatile memory such as, for example, static random access memory(SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), flash memory, read-onlymemory (ROM), etc. The mass storage memory 325 may include any desiredtype of mass storage device including hard disk drives, optical drives,tape storage devices, etc.

The I/O controller 322 performs functions that enable the processor 312to communicate with peripheral input/output (“I/O”) devices 326 and 328and a network interface 330 via an I/O bus 332. The I/O devices 326 and328 may be any desired type of I/O device such as, for example, akeyboard, a video display or monitor, a mouse, etc. The networkinterface 330 may be, for example, an Ethernet device, an asynchronoustransfer mode (“ATM”) device, an 802.11 device, a DSL modem, a cablemodem, a cellular modem, etc. that enables the processor system 310 tocommunicate with another processor system.

While the memory controller 320 and the I/O controller 322 are depictedin FIG. 3 as separate blocks within the chipset 318, the functionsperformed by these blocks may be integrated within a singlesemiconductor circuit or may be implemented using two or more separateintegrated circuits.

It should be understood by any experienced in the art that the inventiveelements, inventive paradigms and inventive methods are represented bycertain exemplary embodiments only. However, the actual scope of theinvention and its inventive elements extends far beyond selectedembodiments and should be considered separately in the context of widearena of the development, engineering, vending, service and support ofthe wide variety of information and computerized systems with specialaccent to sophisticated systems of high load and/or high throughputand/or high performance and/or distributed and/or federated and/ormulti-specialty nature.

Certain embodiments contemplate methods, systems and computer programproducts on any machine-readable media to implement functionalitydescribed above. Certain embodiments may be implemented using anexisting computer processor, or by a special purpose computer processorincorporated for this or another purpose or by a hardwired and/orfirmware system, for example.

One or more of the components of the systems and/or steps of the methodsdescribed above may be implemented alone or in combination in hardware,firmware, and/or as a set of instructions in software, for example.Certain embodiments may be provided as a set of instructions residing ona computer-readable medium, such as a memory, hard disk, DVD, or CD, forexecution on a general purpose computer or other processing device.Certain embodiments of the present invention may omit one or more of themethod steps and/or perform the steps in a different order than theorder listed. For example, some steps may not be performed in certainembodiments of the present invention. As a further example, certainsteps may be performed in a different temporal order, includingsimultaneously, than listed above.

Certain embodiments include computer-readable media for carrying orhaving computer-executable instructions or data structures storedthereon. Such computer-readable media may be any available media thatmay be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer orother machine with a processor. By way of example, suchcomputer-readable media may comprise RAM, ROM, PROM, EPROM, EEPROM,Flash, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage orother magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used tocarry or store desired program code in the form of computer-executableinstructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a generalpurpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor.Combinations of the above are also included within the scope ofcomputer-readable media. Computer-executable instructions comprise, forexample, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer,special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machines toperform a certain function or group of functions.

Generally, computer-executable instructions include routines, programs,objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particulartasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executableinstructions, associated data structures, and program modules representexamples of program code for executing steps of certain methods andsystems disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executableinstructions or associated data structures represent examples ofcorresponding acts for implementing the functions described in suchsteps.

Embodiments of the present invention may be practiced in a networkedenvironment using logical connections to one or more remote computershaving processors. Logical connections may include a local area network(LAN) and a wide area network (WAN) that are presented here by way ofexample and not limitation. Such networking environments are commonplacein office-wide or enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and theInternet and may use a wide variety of different communicationprotocols. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that such networkcomputing environments will typically encompass many types of computersystem configurations, including personal computers, hand-held devices,multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumerelectronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and thelike. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced in distributedcomputing environments where tasks are performed by local and remoteprocessing devices that are linked (either by hardwired links, wirelesslinks, or by a combination of hardwired or wireless links) through acommunications network. In a distributed computing environment, programmodules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.

An exemplary system for implementing the overall system or portions ofembodiments of the invention might include a general purpose computingdevice in the form of a computer, including a processing unit, a systemmemory, and a system bus that couples various system componentsincluding the system memory to the processing unit. The system memorymay include read only memory (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). Thecomputer may also include a magnetic hard disk drive for reading fromand writing to a magnetic hard disk, a magnetic disk drive for readingfrom or writing to a removable magnetic disk, and an optical disk drivefor reading from or writing to a removable optical disk such as a CD ROMor other optical media. The drives and their associatedcomputer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage ofcomputer-executable instructions, data structures, program modules andother data for the computer.

While the invention has been described with reference to certainembodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art thatvarious changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted withoutdeparting from the scope of the invention. In addition, manymodifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material tothe teachings of the invention without departing from its scope.Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to theparticular embodiment disclosed, but that the invention will include allembodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: a medical imageviewer, including a processor, facilitating rendering and display ofmedical image data to a client browser from a server, the viewer to:provide a first view to the client browser in response to a request fromthe client browser for display of medical image data; determine clientcompatibility between the viewer and the client browser; request themedical image data from the server based on the client compatibilitydetermination; render a second view including the medical image data forthe client browser based on the client compatibility determination, thesecond view rendered before being presented to the client browser toremove dead code from the second view, the dead code determined by theviewer to be unused for the client browser based on the clientcompatibility determination; and present the second view for zerofootprint image display to the client browser, wherein the viewerincludes preferred functionality and fallback functionality forrendering and presentation of the second view, one of the preferredfunctionality and the fallback functionality to be selected by theviewer based on the client compatibility determination.
 2. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the client compatibility determination is to analyzeelements in a document object model to determine features available tothe client browser.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first viewincludes a splash screen.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the firstview is to provide introductory or status information via the clientbrowser while the compatibility determination is occurring in thebackground on a device executing the client browser.
 5. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the server includes a middle tier server.
 6. The systemof claim 1, wherein the viewer queries the client browser forconfiguration information to determine client compatibility.
 7. Anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium including computerprogram code to be executed by a processor, the computer program code,when executed, to implement a method comprising: providing a first viewto a client browser via a viewer in response to a request from theclient browser for display of medical image data; determining clientcompatibility between the viewer and the client browser; requesting themedical image data from a server based on the client compatibilitydetermination; render a second view including the medical image data forthe client browser based on the client compatibility determination, thesecond view rendered before being presented to the client browser toremove dead code from the second view, the dead code determined by theviewer to be unused for the client browser based on the clientcompatibility determination; and presenting the second view for zerofootprint image display to the client browser, wherein the viewerincludes preferred functionality and fallback functionality forrendering and presentation of the second view, one of the preferredfunctionality and the fallback functionality to be selected by theviewer based on the client compatibility determination.
 8. Thecomputer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the clientcompatibility determination analyzes elements in a document object modelto determine features available to the client browser.
 9. Thecomputer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the server includesa middle tier server.
 10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim7, wherein the viewer queries the client browser for configurationinformation to determine client compatibility.
 11. The computer-readablestorage medium of claim 7, wherein the first view is to provideintroductory or status information via the client browser while thecompatibility determination is occurring in the background on a deviceexecuting the client browser.
 12. A method comprising: providing, usinga processor, a first view to a client browser via a viewer in responseto a request from the client browser for display of medical image data;determining, using the processor, a client compatibility between theviewer and the client browser; requesting, using the processor, themedical image data from a server based on the client compatibilitydetermination; rendering, using the processor, a second view includingthe medical image data for the client browser based on the clientcompatibility determination, the second view rendered before beingpresented to the client browser to remove dead code from the secondview, the dead code determined by the viewer to be unused for the clientbrowser based on the client compatibility determination; and presenting,using the processor, the second view for zero footprint image display tothe client browser, wherein the viewer includes preferred functionalityand fallback functionality for rendering and presentation of the secondview, one of the preferred functionality and the fallback functionalityto be selected by the viewer based on the client compatibilitydetermination.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the clientcompatibility determination analyzes elements in a document object modelto determine features available to the client browser.
 14. The method ofclaim 12, wherein the first view is to provide introductory or statusinformation via the client browser while the compatibility determinationis occurring in the background on a device executing the client browser.15. The method of claim 12, wherein the first view includes a splashscreen.
 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the server includes a middletier server.
 17. The method of claim 12, wherein the viewer queries theclient browser for configuration information to determine clientcompatibility.